Post by xyz3400 on Feb 20, 2024 2:03:47 GMT -7
It is not exclusive to Brazil. The judicial enforcement of the right to health has increasingly gained space in the debate in different spheres. Whether in public management, in academia, among judges, in companies or even in the press, the discussion is present, necessary and sensitive. It's not for little. The judicialization of health grew by 130% in the 10 years between and . In the same period, the total volume of actions in the country increased by 50%. The data appears in the unprecedented survey produced by Insper at the request of the National Justice Council (CNJ). According to the study, there were 498.7 thousand cases in the first instance and 277.4 thousand in the second instance throughout the analyzed period.
In addition to investigating the evolution of legal actions in the health segment, the work seeks to contribute to the understanding of judicialization and offer subsidies that guide the adoption of policies that improve the resolution of conflicts in the area. It cannot be denied that Justice is, in fact, a legitimate instrument for access to health and an elementary premise of a democracy. If on one side there is the hope of searching for procedures, medicines Honduras Mobile Number List and other services, on the other there is the difficulty of making budget forecasts and distribution of resources by managers in the different spheres of health, threatening their economic and financial sustainability. Judicialization is, today, one of the biggest problems faced by operators and the courts, due to the accumulation of cases. Although recourse to justice is everyone's right, many demands seek to obtain benefits without support from contracts or the Supplementary Health regulatory framework.
There is, for example, the issue of granting medicines without registration with the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa) or that are prescribed for purposes not described in the leaflet, known as off-label. The fact that it has been recognized by the health authority of the drug's country of origin does not attest to its safety for use in other territories or for different pathologies, which can generate serious consequences and side effects for the patient, public health and the system as one all. Even with knowledge about the issue, the impact of judicialization in this area is increasingly greater due to the great demand for highly complex medicines that have not yet been analyzed by the National Commission for the Incorporation of Technologies in the SUS (CONITEC) and included in the List of the National Agency for Supplementary Health ANS.
In addition to investigating the evolution of legal actions in the health segment, the work seeks to contribute to the understanding of judicialization and offer subsidies that guide the adoption of policies that improve the resolution of conflicts in the area. It cannot be denied that Justice is, in fact, a legitimate instrument for access to health and an elementary premise of a democracy. If on one side there is the hope of searching for procedures, medicines Honduras Mobile Number List and other services, on the other there is the difficulty of making budget forecasts and distribution of resources by managers in the different spheres of health, threatening their economic and financial sustainability. Judicialization is, today, one of the biggest problems faced by operators and the courts, due to the accumulation of cases. Although recourse to justice is everyone's right, many demands seek to obtain benefits without support from contracts or the Supplementary Health regulatory framework.
There is, for example, the issue of granting medicines without registration with the National Health Surveillance Agency (Anvisa) or that are prescribed for purposes not described in the leaflet, known as off-label. The fact that it has been recognized by the health authority of the drug's country of origin does not attest to its safety for use in other territories or for different pathologies, which can generate serious consequences and side effects for the patient, public health and the system as one all. Even with knowledge about the issue, the impact of judicialization in this area is increasingly greater due to the great demand for highly complex medicines that have not yet been analyzed by the National Commission for the Incorporation of Technologies in the SUS (CONITEC) and included in the List of the National Agency for Supplementary Health ANS.